Cases 31 - 40 of 584
Pacheco v. Wyatt et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Shelby Wyatt, Jonathan Call, FNU Tilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Ponder v. Hans-Peter Wild
as 23-5620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL H. PONDER
Defendant / Appellee:
HANS-PETER WILD
WHITE-SMITH v. REDD et al
as 2:2023cv02565
Plaintiff:
SHANIA WHITE-SMITH
Defendant:
YACIN REDD, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DUSTIN PONDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
REDD
as 2:2023cv02532
Plaintiff:
YACIN REDD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USPOSTALSERVICE and JUSTIN PONDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
REDD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02533
Plaintiff:
YACIN REDD
Defendant:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and JUSTIN PONDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ponder
as 0:2023mc60899
Plaintiff:
Josephine Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Ponder v. Cohen
as 2:2023cv01924
Petitioner:
Bobby Ponder
Respondent:
Warden Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rollins v. Montes et al
as 3:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Evan Rollins
Defendant:
Montes, Hayden, Boicourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Rice v. Richard Jones, et al
as 23-3373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL D. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, WARDEN/CAPTAIN NICK FISHER, LIEUTENANT ADAMS and others
Alfred McZeal Jr. et al v. HSBC Bank USA National Association et al
as 2:2023cv03088
Plaintiff:
Alfred McZeal, Jr, Jose R. Solano, Vlen Thi Ho and others
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA National Association, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLP, Nabeel Zuberi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
