Cases 31 - 40 of 476
Pullen v. Globus Medical Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pullen
Defendant:
Globus Medical Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Alkafi v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Kasan Alkafi
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Giovinco v. Pullen
as 23-251
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles Anthony Giovinco
Respondent / Appellee:
Timethea Pullen, Warden
PULLEN v. GUILFORD COUNTY
as 1:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
CHARLES ANTHONY PULLEN
Respondent:
GUILFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pullen v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Juan B. Pullen
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
USA v. Oshay Pullen
as 23-10036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
OSHAY LARAY PULLEN
Pittman v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01651
Petitioner:
Marlo Pittman
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Raynor v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01609
Petitioner:
Alicia Raynor and Alicia Nicole Raynor
Defendant:
Pullen
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boehm v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Brian Boehm
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vazzano et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01435
Plaintiff:
Thomas Vazzano, Brandon Lee, Khatilen Lee and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, Glaxosmithkline Holdings (Americas), Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
