Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 181
Lamothe v. Moran et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01028
Plaintiff: Michael Lamothe
Defendant: H. Thomas Moran, Alan Jacobs, Nate Evans and others
Nominal Defendant: Life Partners Holdings, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quill v. Connecticut
as 3:2020mc00053
Petitioner: Sophia Quill
Respondent: State of Connecticut
Spray v. Kenneway We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv11247
Respondent: Steven Kenneway
Petitioner: Quille Merle Spray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LaMothe v. Moran et al
as 4:2020cv00229
Defendant: Alan Jacobs, David Bennett, Eduardo Espinosa and others
Plaintiff: Michael Robert LaMothe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quill v. The Cobb County Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv01672
Defendant: Valentin Giral Carbajal, N. A. Barnes, Valentin Carbajal and others
Plaintiff: Robert Quill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Neary v. Michael Quilling
as 20-10032
Appellee: WILLIAM T. NEARY, United States Trustee Region 6
Appellant: MICHAEL J. QUILLING, Trustee of the Life Partners Holdings Position Holders Trust
William Neary v. Michael Quilling
as 19-90041
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. QUILLING, Trustee of the Life Partners Holdings Position Holders Trust
Respondent: WILLIAM T. NEARY, United States Trustee Region 6
Curtis v. Curran et al
as 1:2019cv07403
Plaintiff: Harold Curtis
Defendant: S. Wilson, Ted Uchiek, Jr., Encinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00938
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
USA v. Sophia Quill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-14327
Defendant / Appellant: SOPHIA QUILL
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?