Cases 31 - 40 of 436
Sanders v. JD Home Rentals et al
as 1:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Phillip Sanders
Defendant:
JD Home Rentals, Lance Armor, R. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOPEZ v. NATOLI et al
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
DEQUINCY R. LOPEZ
Defendant:
ROMAN NATOLI and METHODIST HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
McMillan v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Peter A McMillan
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Silvas v. Mackey et al
as 5:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
David Silvas
Defendant:
Mr. M. Mackey, Mr. T. Hart, Mr. R. Saldivar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eduardo R. Lopez v. Don Barnes et al
as 8:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Eduardo R. Lopez
Defendant:
Don Barnes, Heckhthorn, Gelevan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ v. DONNA
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
DEQUINCY R. LOPEZ
Defendant:
DONNA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOPEZ v. JENKINS
as 1:2021cv02805
Plaintiff:
DEQUINCY R. LOPEZ
Defendant:
JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. HUMPHREY
as 1:2021cv02771
Plaintiff:
DEQUINCY R. LOPEZ
Defendant:
HUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. UNKNOWN OFFICER et al
as 1:2021cv02486
Plaintiff:
DEQUINCY R. LOPEZ
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER, CORECIVIC UN-KNOWN, OFFICER FEMALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Elem, III v. Cynthia Kuhn, et al
as 21-16508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY ELEM III
Defendant / Appellee:
CYNTHIA T. KUHN, named as Hon. Cynthina T Kuhn, Superior Court Judge, official capacity, DANELLE B. LIWSKI, named as Hon. Danelle B Liwski, Superior Court Judge, official capacity, JOHN R. LOPEZ, named as Duty Justice, John R Lopez IV, official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
