Cases 31 - 40 of 181
Davis v. Howard
as 4:2022cv00103
Petitioner:
Thomas Ray Davis
Respondent:
Shawn Howard
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03986
Plaintiff:
ERNEST RAY DAVIS, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00060
Petitioner:
George Ray Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04493
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021at01132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Davis v. Christopher Morledge, et al
as 21-3420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Ray Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Morledge, Judge, St. Francis County Circuit Court (Originally named as Christopher Marledge), Austin Easley, Prosecutor, St. Francis County, John Houseal, Prosecutor, St. Francis County and others
US v. Donald Davis
as 21-4506
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD RAY-EDTUAN DAVIS, a/k/a Donald Ray Davis, a/k/a Donald Ray Bishop, a/k/a Murder One
Davis v. Van Buren County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00831
Plaintiff:
Tommy Ray Davis
Defendant:
Van Buren County Detention Center and Lucas Emberton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Davis v. Gary Musselwhite
as 21-3025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Ray Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Gary Musselwhite, Warden, Grimes Unit ADC (originally named as Marledge)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
