Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Gambill v. Curtis et al
as 4:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Joseph V Gambill
Defendant:
Richard Curtis, Max Cook and R Lawrence Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derek Todd v. Trilla Bahrke, et al
as 13-16366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
TRILLA BAHRKE, California Commissioner, DIRK AMARA, ROBERT MCELHANY, California Judge and others
Todd v. Bahrke, et al.
as 2:2013cv00657
Plaintiff:
Derek Todd
Defendant:
Trilla Bahrke, Alan Pineschi, Charles Wachob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Florence County Detention Center et al
as 5:2012cv03281
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis Freeman, II
Defendant:
Florence County Detention Center and Jacob Speight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Derek Todd v. Richard Curtis, et al
as 12-16760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD CURTIS, Judge, Placer County Superior Court and PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Todd v. Curtis, et. al.
as 2:2012cv01323
Plaintiff:
Derek Todd
Defendant:
Richard Curtis and Placer County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Warden Correctional Reception Center
as 1:2012cv00260
Petitioner:
Richard Curtis
Respondent:
Warden Correctional Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Florence County Detention Center et al
as 5:2012cv00398
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis Freeman, II
Defendant:
Florence County Detention Center, Major Norris, Captain Brunson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Jealous, et al
as 10-2189
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
BENJAMIN JEALOUS, BRUCE GORDON, KWEISI M. FUME and others
Ledbetter et al v. Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
as 7:2010cv00467
Plaintiff:
David Ledbetter , Richard Curtis , Forrest Scott Fikes and others
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
