Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Johnson v. Johnston et al
as 8:2011cv00443
Plaintiff:
Richard Walter Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Diana Jo Johnston, Richard Walter Johnson, Jr. and Donald E. Pigman
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
FEDOR v. VAN NOTE-HARVEY ASSOCIATES, P.C. et al
as 2:2010cv05110
Plaintiff:
SERHIY FEDOR
Defendant:
VAN NOTE-HARVEY ASSOCIATES, P.C., WESPOL CONSTRUCTION INC, WESPOL CONSTRUCTION AND METAL DISTRIBUTORS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALBOYACIAN et al v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2009cv05143
Plaintiff:
ARA ALBOYACIAN, MIKE AGOLIA, ARED ANAC and others
Defendant:
BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
NICHOLAS v. EVANS et al
as 1:2008cv00350
Defendant:
SCOTT ARTHUR EVANS, DAUPHIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JAMES NICHOLAS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walters v. Bausch & Lomb Inc
as 2:2008cv01511
Plaintiff:
Richard Walters, Richard Walters, Richard Walters and others
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Inc, Bausch & Lomb Inc, Bausch & Lomb Inc and others
Special Master:
Daniel Capra
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Defreitas v. William Hird & Co. Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00364
Plaintiff:
Larry Defreitas
Defendant:
William Hird & Co. Inc, Thomas Bury, Bernard Antione and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON V US
as 01-5021
Plaintiff-Appellant:
RICHARD WALTER JOHNSON, RICHARD WALTER JOHNSON and RICHARD WALTER JOHNSON
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
