Cases 31 - 40 of 76
In re: Bishop, III
as 16-1762
Petitioner:
HARRY C. BISHOP, III
Respondent:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, WENDY RIEBE, individually and in her official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Correct Care Solutions LLC, SCOTT LANDRY, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine Correctional Center and others
Grange Indemnity Insurance Company v. Riebe et al
as 2:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Grange Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Joyce Riebe and Kim Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BISHOP v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
HARRY C BISHOP, III
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC, WENDY RIEBE, ROBERT CLINTON, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becker v. Riebe et al
as 2:2015cv02039
Plaintiff:
Joseph Becker
Defendant:
Todd Riebe and Robert Trudgen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLADU v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv00384
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A GLADU
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, ROBERT J CLINTON, GEORGE STOCKWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Life Insurance Company of the Southwest v. Ty-Riebe
as 1:2015cv13310
Plaintiff:
Life Insurance Company of the Southwest
Defendant:
Ratana Ty-Riebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rieb v. Rawlinson et al
as 1:2015cv02933
Plaintiff:
Eric Andrew Rieb
Defendant:
Bradford A Rawlinson, Robert M Stevenson, III, John Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESPOSITO v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A ESPOSITO
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, WENDY RIEBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WORTHLEY v. LNU, CINDY et al
as 2:2015cv00226
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WORTHLEY
Defendant:
LNU, CINDY, DENISE SHIPMAN, THAYER, SGT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INMAN v. RIEBE et al
as 2:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
FRANK INMAN
Defendant:
WENDY RIEBE, ROBERT CLINTON and GEORGE STOCKWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
