Cases 31 - 40 of 1,480
Rocha v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.
as 24-864
Plaintiff:
JESSICA ROCHA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Rocha-Saldana v. Garland
as 24-732
Petitioner:
PEDRO ROCHA-SALDANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Salvador Cardona Rocha v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01190
Petitioner:
Salvador Cardona Rocha
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rocha v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Rocha
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Barrera et al v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr., Tyron Dyeralle Davis, Cesar Rueda and others
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Vose v. Kilmartin, et al
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
CARLTON VOSE
Defendant:
PETER F. KILMARTIN, GERALD J. COYNE, PATRICIA K. ROCHA and others
Rocha v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Toni Gomez Rocha
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martinez et al v. City of Fresno et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Desiree Martinez and We Are Not Invisible
Defendant:
City of Fresno, Howard Lacy, David Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
