Cases 31 - 40 of 281
Joe Baltas v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6590
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER J. MILGRAM, In His Individual and Official Capacities, SERGEANT LITTLE, In His Individual and Official Capacities, UNIT MANAGER ERIC MILLER, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE BALTAS
Edwards v. Fuller et al
as 7:2021cv00196
Defendant:
D. Barton, L. Collins, S. Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrick Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. Red Onion State Prisons Medical Department et al
as 7:2021cv00051
Defendant:
S. Fletcher, Regional Director, B. Witt and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Troy Braxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01951
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZEBADIAH S ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Michael Ruggles v. David Ige, et al
as 20-17410
Defendant / Appellee:
MAUI WELLNESS GROUP LLC, Maui Grown Therapies, TCG RETRO MARKET 1, LLC, Cure Oahu, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DOYLE RUGGLES
SCOTT v. FRAME
as 3:2020cv05968
Plaintiff:
STACY ANTONIO SCOTT, JR and STACY CHANEL
Defendant:
W TURNER, D DICE, P TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02475
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Salmen v. California Department of Correction Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2020cv02088
Defendant:
H. Franklin, Dr. J. Hodges, S. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Salmen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
