Cases 31 - 40 of 151
Nelson v. College Chefs, LLC
as 4:2020cv00357
Defendant:
College Chefs, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Nelson and Michael S. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad
Timothy Wilkins v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 20-17257
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, BAYONETTA, S. NELSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEANORE WILKINS
NELSON v. USA
as 2:2020cv01046
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ERIC S. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NELSON v. USA
as 2:2020cv02564
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ERIC S. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75048
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON S. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fucci et al v. Bowser et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Samson, Maxon-Multiline, EC9 Holdings and others
Defendant:
J&J Cubit Construction, Christopher J. Ashby, Kate Jensen and others
Timothy Wilkins v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-16718
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, BAYONETTA, S. NELSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEANORE WILKINS
DiTucci, et al v. Bowser, et al
as 19-4107
Defendant:
NOAH CORPORATION, a Utah corporation, LEFEVRE MANAGEMENT, a Utah corporation, DBA Cadence Property Advisors, DBA Cadence Property Administrators, ROCKWELL DEBT FREE PROPERTIES, a Utah corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SANFORD ROBERTS, an individual, BRUCE I. ROSE, an individual, RUSSELL E. HERTRICH, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM BOWSER, an individual and GABRIEL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a Utah corporation
Nestle USA, Inc. v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv00176
Defendant:
Matthew Clark and Law Offices of Mark S. Nelson
Plaintiff:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
(PC) Wilkins v. CDCR et al
as 2:2018cv03163
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Defendant:
S. Kernan, CDCR, Bayonetta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
