Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 14-1335
Amicus Curiae:
CARROLL GANTZ, RALPH D. CLIFFORD, JOSEPH M. BALLAY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
APPLE INC., a California Corporation
SAS Institute Inc. v. Minequest Business Analytics, LLC
as 1:2013mc00078
Petitioner:
SAS Institute Inc.
Respondent:
Minequest Business Analytics, LLC
Data Engine Technologies LLC v. SAS Institute, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00579
Plaintiff:
Data Engine Technologies LLC
Defendant:
SAS Institute, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
ComplementSoft, LLC v. SAS Institute Inc.
as 1:2012cv07372
Plaintiff:
ComplementSoft, LLC
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
SAS Institute Inc. v. SAS Groupe
as 5:2012cv00494
Plaintiff:
SAS Institute Inc.
Defendant:
SAS Groupe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
InvestPic LLC v. SAS Institute Inc.
as 1:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
InvestPic LLC
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bright Response, LLC v. SAS Institute Inc.
as 2:2012cv00280
Plaintiff:
Bright Response, LLC
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SAS Institute v. World Programming Limited
as 11-1783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAS INSTITUTE, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
WORLD PROGRAMMING LIMITED
SAS Institute, Inc. v. World Programming Limited
as 11-1783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAS INSTITUTE, INC., Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
WORLD PROGRAMMING LIMITED
SAS Institute Inc. et al v. Schull et al
as 4:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
SAS Institute Inc. , SAS Retirement Plan and Plan Administrator Committee for the SAS Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Dixie Schull, Patricia Waclawski and Kathleen Waclawski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
