Cases 31 - 40 of 47
ENGLISH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv02534
Petitioner:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STENY HOYER, BRAD SHERMAN, ELIZABETH WARREN and others
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, DONALD JOHN TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
LEANDRA ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
McMasters-Stone et al v. Biden
as 2:2012cv02711
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. McMasters-Stone
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Daniel Akaka, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keith Judd v. Barrack Hussein Obama et al
as 2:2012cv09319
Defendant:
Tammy Baldwin, Sherrod Brown, Bob Casey, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Judd
Wade v. Akaka et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Defendant:
Daniel Akaka, Lamar Alexander, Kelly Ayotte and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Wagner et al
as 1:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
Wagner, Dixon, Donna Zickefiose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Frederick Banks v. Sager, et al
as 11-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAGER, Ft. Dix, R & D Officer, R&D DEPT, FORT DIX FCI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
