Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Sharp v. Town of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina et al
as 2:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Linda R. Sharp
Defendant:
Town of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, Griggs & Co. Homes, Inc., D. Ken Griggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Michael Vulpis v. M. D. McDonald
as 2:2010cv06754
Respondent:
M. D. McDonald
Petitioner:
Steve Michael Vulpis
Discovery Voyages et al v. Hirsch et al
as 3:2010cv00104
Plaintiff:
Discovery Voyages and Dean Rand
Defendant:
Linda Hirsch and Steve Michaels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steve Cox v. Richard Falge, et al
as 10-15507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE MICHAEL COX
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD FALGE and TONY JONES
Steve Cox v. Terrel Bishop, et al
as 10-15391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE MICHAEL COX
Defendant - Appellee:
TERREL BISHOP, BOJA LEMICH and ROBERT CHAMBLISS
Hahn, et al v. CA Dept. of Parks and Recreation, et al
as 2:2009cv01479
Plaintiff:
Lawrence V. Hahn and Coldstream Adventures Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant:
California Department of Parks and Recreation, Pam Armas, Tara Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hahn et al v. California Department of Parks and Recreation et al
as 2:2009at00828
Plaintiff:
Lawrence V. Hahn and Coldstream Adventures Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant:
California Department of Parks and Recreation, Pam Armas, Tara Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cox v. Benedetti et al
as 3:2008cv00502
Plaintiff:
Steve Michael Cox
Defendant:
James Benedetti, Tony Corda, John Peery and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Fasono
as 08-60750
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVE MICHAEL FASONO, also known as Steve Michael Fasano
Steve Cox v. E. McDaniel, et al
as 08-16725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE MICHAEL COX
Defendant - Appellee:
E.K. MCDANIEL, Warden, WILLIAM BOOK, ADAM ENDEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
