Cases 31 - 40 of 44
BUZARD v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC et al
as 3:2010cv06769
Plaintiff:
YVONNE BUZARD
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. , THE HOME DEPOT, INC. , RMA HOME SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larry Pearson, et al v. THD At Home Services, Inc.
as 10-14463
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LARRY PEARSON and BRENT PERKEY
Defendant - Appellant:
THD AT HOME SERVICES, INC.
Veseli v. THD At-Home Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00715
Plaintiff:
Bekim Veseli
Defendant:
THD At-Home Services, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv06160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Seavey v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
Norman Seavey
Defendant:
The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and THD At-Home Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson et al v. THD At Home Services, Inc.
as 8:2009cv02062
Plaintiff:
Larry Pearson and Brent Perkey
Defendant:
THD At Home Services, Inc. and THD At Home Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Schmidtke v. THD At-Home Services, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00574
Plaintiff:
Fred Schmidtke
Defendant:
THD At-Home Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Wilson v. THD At-Home Services, Inc.
as 9:2009cv80788
Plaintiff:
Eric Wilson and Eric Wilson
Defendant:
THD At-Home Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Brown v. THD At-Home Services Inc
as 2:2009cv00566
Plaintiff:
Mark A Brown
Defendant:
THD At-Home Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
