Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,200
TOBY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv04171
Plaintiff: DANA TOBY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mackall v. Dymond et al
as 8:2024cv02289
Defendant: Adam Dymond and Peter T. Aurich
Plaintiff: Toby R. Mackall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00579
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Faris v. Seu, et al.
as 1:2024cv00247
Defendant: Thomas B. Fargo, William James Scilacci, Jr., James A. Ajello and others
Plaintiff: Robert Faris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Antoine v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00904
Plaintiff: Toby Lee Antoine
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03488
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Toby Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00599
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CLAYTON v. KELMON et al
as 5:2024cv00165
Defendant: DEREK WILKES, JOHN DOE, LOGAN and others
Plaintiff: EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parnell et al v. School Board of Nassau County, Florida et al
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff: M.L., Peter Parnell, A.M. and others
Defendant: Dr. Kari Burgess-Watkins, Dr. Kathy Burns, Misty Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castro v. Wallace
as 24-50379
Defendant: Counsel Substitute Jane Doe #3, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in her Individual and Official Capacity, Counsel Substitute Jane Doe #2, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in her Individual and Official Capacity, Beverly Dawn Smith and others
Plaintiff: Hubert Edward Castro

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?