Cases 31 - 40 of 2,282
NLRB v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 24-1531
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
ROBERT C. ATKINSON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02415
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ENDRES
Defendant:
AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sevillano-Seda v. Union de Tronquistas de Puerto Rico, Local 901 et al
as 3:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Jose Rafael Sevillano-Seda
Defendant:
Union de Tronquistas de Puerto Rico, Local 901, United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
BLAKEY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE BLAKEY
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hernandez v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hernandez
Defendant:
Yosvany Rodriguez, United Parcel Service, Inc., Coyote Logistics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
