Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 3:2014mc00567
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Jan Brewer, Tom Horne and others
Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 3:2014mc00535
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Jan Brewer, Tom Horne and others
Curry, Jr. v. Gradie et al
as 4:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Gradie, Unknown McNeil, James Holmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hearron v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, Kentrell Liddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2013cv01538
Plaintiff:
Martin James Sharpe
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, William Akerman, Unknown Dentist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cooks v. Warden et al
as 4:2012cv01606
Plaintiff:
Gary Allan Cooks
Defendant:
Unknown Warden, Unknown Eye Doctor and Unknown Dentist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Tierney v. Unknown Dentist, et al
as 11-16643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN DENTIST, UNKNOWN DENTAL ASSISTANT, UNKNOWN DENTAL ASSISTANT 2 and others
Tierney v. Unknown Dentist et al
as 1:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
Unknown Dentist, Unknown Dental Assistant, Unknow Dental Assistant 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw, et al v. Lappin, et al
as 10-1434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BRADSHAW and TIMOTHY TUTTAMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
LAPPIN, BOP Director, WILEY, ADX Warden, COLLINS, Unit Team Member and others
David Upton v. Aref Fakhoury et al
as 5:2010cv00702
Defendant:
Aref Fakhoury, Unknown Dentist and Unknown Dentist
Plaintiff:
David Upton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
