Cases 31 - 40 of 129
Robinson v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv02350
Plaintiff:
William Steven Robinson
Defendant:
Frank Jones, Rafferty Fuqua, Veronica Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
William A. Robinson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv50136
Plaintiff:
William W Robinson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
ROBINSON v. WARDEN APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al.
as 5:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MACK ROBINSON
Defendant:
WARDEN APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JULIE JONES and CALLOWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Warden Apalachee Corr Inst. et al
as 3:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
William Mack Robinson
Defendant:
Warden Apalachee Corr Inst., Julie Jones and Ms. Calloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. USA et al
as 1:2017cv09415
Plaintiff:
William Ulyssess Robinson
Defendant:
USA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, US ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. USA et al
as 1:2017fp00385
Defendant:
Marylin Angud, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ruben B. Morales and others
Plaintiff:
William Ulyssess Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ciarletto v. McMillan Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01433
Plaintiff:
Eileen K. Ciarletto
Defendant:
McMillan Transport, Inc. and William R. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRUNSON v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv04577
Plaintiff:
CHIFFONE BRUNSON
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CITY OF EAST ORANGE, EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barberi v. Robinson et al
as 1:2017cv21739
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
William Turner Robinson and Katherine U. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
