Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Crawford v. OfficeMax Incorporated
as 5:2011cv00586
Plaintiff:
William Crawford
Defendant:
OfficeMax Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
CRAWFORD v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv04218
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CRAWFORD
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 2:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
William Crawford
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steadman v. Estes et al
as 6:2010cv00369
Plaintiff:
Lee Earl Steadman
Defendant:
Ryan Estes and William Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
William Crawford
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Parker et al v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
as 3:2008cv01734
Plaintiff:
David L. Parker, Julie Faith Parker and William Crawford
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
William-Crawford: Jr.: and et al v. CTX Mortgage Company, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01117
Plaintiff:
William-Crawford: Jr.: and and Felicia: Dontonya:
Defendant:
CTX Mortgage Company, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv10426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Great Northern Insurance Company et al v. Altmans Products L L C et al
as 2:2008cv10395
Plaintiff:
Great Northern Insurance Company, William Crawford and Marilyn Crawford
Defendant:
Altmans Products LLC and Precision Brass Services, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
