Cases 31 - 40 of 455
NELSON v. SCHULMAN et al
as 3:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN NELSON
Defendant:
DANIEL H. SCHULMAN, JOHN D. RAINEY, RODNEY C. ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Pillard et al v. PayPal, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Ashley Pillard and Destiny Rucker
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Ex Parte Application of Shueisha Inc. et al v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2022mc80273
Plaintiff:
In Re Ex Parte Application of Shueisha Inc. et al, Shueisha Inc., Shogakukan Inc. and others
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc., Mastercard International Incorporated, Google, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jackson v. Google et al
as 1:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Carmela Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
Google, PayPal, Facebook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ScanComm LLC v. PayPal, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
ScanComm LLC
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stoute v. PayPal, Inc.
as 1:2023cv10117
Plaintiff:
Stephen Stoute
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KOL Hadash Humanistic Congregation et al v. PayPal, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06532
Plaintiff:
KOL Hadash Humanistic Congregation and DC Central Kitchen
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc., PayPal Charitable Giving Fund, Nick Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
