Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 16,774
Campbell v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01464
Plaintiff: Carrie Campbell
Defendant: Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Campbell
as 2:2024mc50507
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00944
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Campbell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02607
Plaintiff: Alecia Campbell
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campbell v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02570
Plaintiff: Terry Campbell
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Newsome et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff: Nathanael Lee Smith
Defendant: Gavin Newsome, Kevin Seibert, Hallie Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hertzel et al v. Loggers' Run, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv80640
Plaintiff: Rabbi Naftaly Hertzel, Henya Hertzel and Chabad Israeli Center, Inc.
Defendant: Loggers' Run, Inc., Campbell Property Management and Real Estate, Inc., Ronald Harp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Dinh v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff: Quoc Dinh
Defendant: Julie Campbell, Christopher D. Hunt, Jason K. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Kanautica Zayre-Brown v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 24-6477
Plaintiff: KANAUTICA ZAYRE-BROWN
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, TODD E. ISHEE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, GARY JUNKER, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction and others
In re: Clyde Campbell
as 24-60239
Petitioner: In re: Clyde Campbell

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?