Cases 41 - 50 of 589
Brown Sr. v. Wade et al
as 6:2022cv01149
Plaintiff:
Carlos Dewayne Brown and Carlos Dewayne Brown Sr.
Defendant:
J. Wade, FNU Parker, FNU Williker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glen Schooley v. Option One Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 22-13534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN SCHOOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, LINDA FLOWERS and SHARON CASON
GILLIAM v. CASON et al.
as 1:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MATHIS GILLIAM
Defendant:
JODI CASON and DENISE R FERRERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
4405 Navarro Owner LLC v. Crestmarc VPC Autumn Park, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
4405 Navarro Owner LLC
Defendant:
Crestmarc VPC Autumn Park, LLC and Greg Cason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robert Cason v. Middlesex County Prosecutors Office, et al
as 22-2711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CASON
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, OLD BRIDGE POLICE, BRACHT and others
Defendant:
ANTONIO J. TOTO
Cason et al v. Boone et al
as 3:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Breonna Cason, Kennith D.L. Van Buren and Rosalind Van Buren
Defendant:
Corey Boone, Brad Bars, Clear Creek Landings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Terry Cason
as 22-13431
Petitioner:
In re: TERRY JEROME CASON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CASON v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE et al
as 3:2022cv05503
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CASON
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, OLD BRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER G. BRACHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Cason
as 22-50766
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony L. Cason
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
