Cases 41 - 50 of 11,446
Clarence Jenkins, Jr. v. Sherman Campbell
as 24-1382
Petitioner:
CLARENCE REED JENKINS, JR.
Respondent:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeVinney v. Jenkins et al
as 9:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Philip W. DeVinney
Defendant:
J. Jenkins, Dalton Russell and Tioga County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Campbell, et al.
as 24-2736
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE JENKINS
Defendant:
T.L. CAMPBELL, Warden, L. HURTADO, Correctional Officer and Z. MADDEN, Correctional Officer
Alexander v. Washington County et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Philemon Alexander
Defendant:
Washington County, B. Jenkins, Ruipert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Livingston v. Regalado et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Livingston also known as Aaron J Clarke doing business as Gtwo, Aaron J Clarke, Aaron J Livingston also known as Clarke doing business as Gtwo and others
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriff's Office, Jared Daniel Bakker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jenkins v. Warden Lavern
as 0:2024cv02636
Petitioner:
Adrian Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden Lavern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
