Cases 41 - 50 of 6,098
Paula Ferreira Silva et al v. Brandon Wolfe et al
as 2:2024cv06433
Defendant:
Scott Ange, XBQ Management, Inc., Wolfe Canyon Ranch, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Santos Silva and Paula Ferreira Silva
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Alejandro Nunez et al v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv06414
Plaintiff:
Mozhgan Samiei, Jesus Perez, Cecilia Valenzuela and others
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation and First Element, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Antitrust Litigation
Russell v. Wilcoxen, et al.
as 24-4664
Defendant:
CHACON, C/O WILCOXEN, GARRETT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMELLE L. RUSSELL
Bodiford et al v. Medrite Midtown West LLC et al
as 1:2024cv05785
Defendant:
Engie Silva and Medrite Midtown West LLC
Plaintiff:
Kelli Bodiford, Ngozi Okpu, Jada Madeam and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kayo Constancio Silva v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv06367
Defendant:
defendant VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.,
Plaintiff:
Kayo Constancio Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Da Silva Borges, et al v. Garland
as 24-1695
Petitioner:
ELIANE MARIA SILVA TEIXEIRA BORGES, DAVI LUCCA SILVA BORGES, ARTHUR SILVA BORGES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Carter v. Cederholm et al
as 3:2024cv50319
Plaintiff:
Shaquan Carter
Defendant:
Righteous, Cederholm, Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Silva
as 4:2024cv40100
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Kate Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jefferson v. Silva et al
as 3:2024cv04181
Defendant:
Ruiz Raidel Genovevo Silva and Empire Transport Solutions Corp
Plaintiff:
Gwandulyn Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
