Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 27,533
Hill et al v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00737
Plaintiff: Tameca Hill
Defendant: Brian Young, Richard Tolentino, Alexander Verreault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Thomas KuhlIn re: Thomas Kuhl
as 24-1506
Petitioner: In re: THOMAS BENJAMIN KUHL, Uncle and Next Friend of Samuel Alexander Kuhl
USA v. Kali Alexander
as 24-3518
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KALI ALEXANDER
Robert Tlusty v. D. Swain, et al
as 24-11921
Plaintiff: ROBERT J. TLUSTY
Defendant: D. SWAIN, Correctional Officer, K. DAVIS, Correctional Officer, J. ELLENBURG, Correctional Officer and others
Meysenburg v. Midwest Medical Transport Company, LLC
as 4:2024cv03107
Plaintiff: Alexander Meysenburg
Defendant: Midwest Medical Transport Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Groys Med Supply Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv04169
Plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation and others
Defendant: Groys Med Supply Corp., Edelweiss Med Supply Corp., TX Freechem Supply Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Morris v. Ascension Macomb Oakland Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv11502
Plaintiff: Alexander Morris
Defendant: Ascension Macomb Oakland Hospital, Holly Jackson and Greg Ciesielski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hertzock v. Alexander, et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff: BRENNAN HERTZOCK
Defendant: JEROME ALEXANDER and ANDERSON TRANSPORTATION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barmer v. Pentow
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff: David A. Barmer
Defendant: Alexander Pentow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Estrada-Marroquin v. Garland
as 24-3612
Petitioner: RENE ALEXANDER ESTRADA-MARROQUIN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?