Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams et al v. Jackson Hole Snowmobile Tours Inc
as 2:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jody R Williams and Andrea Williams
Defendant:
Old Faithful Snowmobile Tours Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. KB Investments & Realty, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Donnie King, Sr.
Defendant:
KB Investments & Realty, LLC , Hutchens, Senter & Britton, P.A. , Elizabeth B. Ells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Ruvin et al
as 1:2011cv21853
Plaintiff:
Samuel Obediah Miller
Defendant:
Harvey Ruvin, Andrea Williams, Christopher Albury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herod v. King County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2010cv01725
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Herod
Defendant:
King County Correctional Facility, Vicki Shumaker, D. Dglo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07302
Plaintiff:
Andrea Williams
Defendant:
City of New York, New York Ciy Health and Hospitals Corporation, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv06238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
VISION BANK v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2010cv00070
Plaintiff:
VISION BANK
Defendant:
THAD WILLIAMS and ANDREA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Andrea Williams v. Timothy Lundquist
as 10-1704
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREA WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY LUNDQUIST
Williams v. Williams et al
as 3:2008cv01937
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Andrea Williams, C Kramer, Glenn Twigglier and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
