Cases 41 - 50 of 180
Ahmed Mohammed et al v. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
as 1:2021cv06844
Plaintiff:
RASHAD LUFT AHMED MOHAMMED, 1902 New Way Gourmet Inc. and Rashad Lutf Ahmed Mohammed
Defendant:
United States Dep't of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gamily v. Garland
as 21-312
Petitioner:
AHMED MOHAMMED SHERIF GAMILY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sheikh Osman v. Garland
as 21-60508
Petitioner:
Ahmed Mohammed Sheikh Osman
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00033
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GAMBOUR v. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES and ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
ARNJAD AHMED MOHAMED KHAIR GAMBOUR and AMJAD AHMED MOHAMED KHAIR GAMBOUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mohamed v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv02062
Defendant:
Eby-Brown Company, LLC, James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beladi et al v. Bilken et al
as 1:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Beladi and Ilihin Hassen Ibrahim
Defendant:
Debra Rogers, Monty Wilkinson, David Renzi and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Perez v. Mohamed et al
as 5:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Ahmed Mohamed, US Xpress Leasing Inc, U.S. Xpress, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Autumn Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
