Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 545
In Re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406
as 2:2013cv20000
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs' Counsel, Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, Judy Sheridan and others
Defendant: Anthem, Inc., BCBSM, Inc.,, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and others
Special Master: Special Master
In Re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406
Respondent: Baycare Health System, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ATLANTIC NEUROSURGICAL SPECIALISTS et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv20052
Plaintiff: ATLANTIC NEUROSURGICAL SPECIALISTS, ATLANTIC SHORE SURGICAL ASSOCS., PC and ATLANTIC SHORE SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, PC
Defendant: ANTHEM, INC., d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, f/k/a WellPoint, Inc., ANTHEM INS. COS., INC., d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, ANTHEM LIFE INS., d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
In Re: Epipen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2017md02785
Defendant: Epipen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation **COUNSEL: DO NOT ADD PARTIES.**, Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., Mylan Specialty, LP and others
In Re: Epipen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation, Consumer Class Cases Plaintiffs, All Plaintiffs (for Lead/Liaison Counsel ONLY) and others
Plaintiff: Kimberly Dollander, Lisa Vogel, April Sumner and others
Special Master: Honorable Margaret R. Hinkle (Ret.)
Not Classified By Court: Horizon Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Jersey, Coventry Health Care, Elan Klein and others
Petitioner: Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., Amerigroup Corporation, Anthem, Inc. and others
Interested Party: kaleo, Inc., MedImpact Healthcare Systems, Inc., Change Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multi-District Litigation
Collins et. al. v. Anthem, Inc. et. al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01969
Plaintiff: Marissa Collins, James Burnett and Karyn Sanchez
Defendant: Anthem, Inc. and Anthem UM Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: John Bickerman
Intervenor Plaintiff: P.I. and A.I.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
plaintiffperson et al v. Anthem Inc
as 2:2022cv03940
Plaintiff: joe plaintiffperson
Petitioner: DOES
Defendant: Anthem Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02048
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00476
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ANTHEM, INC. v. PIPER
as 1:2022cv00450
Affeld Grivakes LLP v. David Castellani et al
as 2:2021cv09182
Plaintiff: Affeld Grivakes LLP
Defendant: David Castellani, Anthem Inc. dba Anthem Health, Inc., DOES 1 though 20, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?