Cases 41 - 50 of 2,444
Urbikas v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv02553
Plaintiff:
Anton L. Urbikas
Defendant:
Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing v. Murphy et al
as 3:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
John Anthony Murphy and Polaris Rental Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Tyrrell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Shane Anton Tyrrell
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tolliver v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Anton Tolliver
Defendant:
Anoop Thomas, John Doe and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Gulf Coast Building Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Amy Hill
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Building Products, Inc. and Anton Herbst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
WILLIAMSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
RODNEY ANTON WILLIAMSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wilson v. Arellano et al
as 2:2024cv14061
Plaintiff:
Farris E Wilson
Defendant:
Erik Arellano and Nicholas Anton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Arellano et al
as 2:2024cv14060
Plaintiff:
Farris E Wilson
Defendant:
Erik Arellano and Nicholas Anton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Li et al v. Clarum, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
ShaoJun Li and Lumy AI, Inc.
Defendant:
Clarum, Inc. and Anton Otaner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
