Cases 41 - 50 of 153,179
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Light v. Attorney General of the State of West Virginia
as 2:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Jeremy Colton Light
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delano (PS) v. Hansen et al
as 1:2024cv01428
Petitioner:
Delano Medina and Medina Delano
Respondent:
Jennifer Hansen and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
STEVENS v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2024cv06291
Petitioner:
CALVIN STEVENS
Respondent:
CHARLES ELLIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Moore v. Reyes et al
as 5:2024cv05032
Petitioner:
Nakota Moore
Respondent:
Alex Reyes and Attorney General of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos Cano, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3211
Petitioner:
ANA LETICIA RAMOS CANO, ARELI HERRERA RAMOS and JUAN HERRERA RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vega Lorente v. Garland
as 24-3215
Petitioner:
SABASTIAN ANTONIO VEGA LORENTE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
