Cases 41 - 50 of 16,860
Cruzen v. Thomas
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Shirley Cruzen
Defendant:
Bill Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BILLINGS v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06267
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH BILLINGS
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cooper v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Monolito B. Cooper
Defendant:
Bill Lee and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sheila Eyajan v. Andrews and Pontius LLC, et al
as 24-1923
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Defendant:
ANDREWS AND PONTIUS LLC, CAROLYN E. SMITH, DALE C. SMITH and others
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Stark et al v. K&C Specialties Corp. et al
as 0:2024cv01762
Plaintiff:
Painters and Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Initiative, the, Jeff Stark, Nick Nowak and others
Defendant:
K&C Specialties Corp. and James Isaac Spinks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Zuko v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Sokol Zuko
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
