Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 14,011
Thomas et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01993
Plaintiff: Walter Thomas and Desmond Bailey
Defendant: Victor Hill and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barren v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-2896
Plaintiff: DONALD ROBIN BARREN
Defendant: THE STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM LAWSON, P. JORDAN and others
Bailey v. Paxton
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff: Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant: Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Hall v. DAC Prison
as 24-6261
Plaintiff: ADAM WADE HALL, a/k/a Abdul Al Kareem Muhammad
Defendant: DAC PRISON and RAYMOND BAILEY, Tabor CI Program Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00512
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States v. Jeffrey Bailey
as 24-1945
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Jeffrey Bailey
Bailey v. Olympia Union Gospel Mission, et al.
as 24-2851
Plaintiff: JARED J. BAILEY
Defendant: OLYMPIA UNION GOSPEL MISSION, OLYMPIA UNION GOSPEL MISSION BOARD OF DIRECTORS, LOREN STEFFEN, Executive Director, CEO also known as Skip Steffen and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?