Cases 41 - 50 of 970
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01447
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes v. DeFries et al
as 0:2023cv60948
Plaintiff:
Jason Dale Rhodes
Defendant:
Shannon C. DeFries, Justin C. Carlin, Edward Scott Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lemus Berrios v. Gouff et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Defendant:
Brian Gouff, Kenneth Hardman, Ms. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRIOS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
OSBALDO LEMUS BERRIOS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KINCH v. CAULFIELD et al
as 2:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MAURICE KINCH
Defendant:
REGINA CAULFIELD, JUAN SMITH, ANTONIO LACOSTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
US v. Recarey-Salas, et al
as 23-1304
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO RECAREY-SALAS
Interested Party:
ESTATE OF ALBERTO AVILES, SCOTIABANK DE PUERTO RICO, ALFONSA RODRIGUEZ-CHAPARRO and others
US v. Vazquez-Berrios
as 23-1311
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL VAZQUEZ-BERRIOS
BERRIOS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05644
Plaintiff:
OSCAR BERRIOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark et al v. George Junior Republic et al
as 2:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
QUINTIS CLARK, CHARLES SLADE, III, ALEXANDER GRANGER and others
Defendant:
GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC, GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC REALTY, GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC IN PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
