Cases 41 - 50 of 229
Payne et al v. Oakwood Homes, et al
as 5:2020cv00296
Plaintiff:
Don Albert Payne and Gloria Jean Payne
Defendant:
Oakcrest Point Limited Partnership, CMH Homes, Inc., Oakwood Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHEPPARD et al v. SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES INC et al
as 1:2020cv00047
Defendant:
SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES INC and CMH HOMES INC
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SHEPPARD and SHILENE SHEPPARD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Riggs v. CMH Homes, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Riggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webb v. CMH Homes, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00214
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Webb
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Douglas Baker, et al v. CMH Homes, Inc.
as 19-35863
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARIA KAY DUPUIS-BAKER, as a married couple and DOUGLAS R. BAKER
Defendant / Appellant:
CMH HOMES, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, DBA Clayton Homes #742
Ratliff et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brandon Ratliff and Letisha Dawn Ratliff
Defendant:
CMH Services, Inc., CMH Homes, Inc. and Southern Energy Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00040
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brandon Ratliff
Defendant:
CMH Services, Inc., CMH Homes, Inc. and Southern Energy Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00041
Defendant:
CMH Services, Inc., CMH Homes, Inc. and Southern Energy Homes, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Letisha Dawn Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
I.R. v. CMH Homes, Inc., et al.
as 1:2019cv00042
Defendant:
CMH Services, Inc., CMH Homes, Inc. and Southern Energy Homes, Inc.
Plaintiff:
I.R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
