Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 13-1790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN, MARYLIN E. ATKINS and others
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 13-1507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN, MARYLIN E. ATKINS and others
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 13-1340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN
Young v. Griffin et al
as 1:2012cv03009
Plaintiff:
Rodney David Young
Defendant:
Christopher Griffin, Tammy Hamilton and Mary Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. McGuire
as 4:2009cv00757
Petitioner:
Christopher Griffin
Respondent:
Jill McGuire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 09-2155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 09-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ceasar et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01753
Plaintiff:
Julius Ceasar, Julius Ceasar, Frank Ceasar, Jr and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C and Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 08-1618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
