Cases 41 - 50 of 461
Caddell et al v. Obion County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Caddell, Deandre" Pickering, Gary Baker and others
Defendant:
Obion County Detention Center, Carl Jackson, Kent Treece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchfield v. Coker Tire Company
as 2:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Mike Crutchfield
Defendant:
Coker Tire Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Crutchfield v. Weakley County
as 1:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Weakley County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romantix-Fargo, Inc. v. City of Fargo, et al
as 23-1035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Romantix-Fargo, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Fargo, North Dakota and Nicole Crutchfield, In her Official Capacity as the Director of Planning and Development
Brian Alford v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 22-4082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH ALFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, et al, ERNIE MOORE, JOCELYN SCHWEITZER and others
Crutchfield III et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2022cv08860
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Crutchfield III and Laurie Crutchfield
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
CRUTCHFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23487
Plaintiff:
DAVID JAMES CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crutchfield III et al v. Monsanto Company
as 0:2022cv02910
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Crutchfield III and Laurie Crutchfield
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
