Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Wilson v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00030
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Wilson
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stepheney v. Wilson et al
as 1:2011cv03261
Plaintiff:
Wade Stepheney, Jr
Defendant:
Cynthia Wilson, Paul G Bidwell, Lisa T Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parr et al v. Sigalas et al
as 1:2009cv00366
Plaintiff:
Matthew Parr and C.C.H. and A.V.H.
Defendant:
Sharon Sigalas, Youth Court of Jackson County Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parr et al v. Sigalas et al
as 5:2009cv00411
Plaintiff:
Matthew Parr and C.C.H. and A.V.H.
Defendant:
Sharon Sigalas, Youth Court of Jackson County Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Jones et al
as 2:2008cv04415
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Wilson, Cynthia Wilson, Cynthia Wilson and others
Defendant:
John Albert Jones, Julius Miller, Metry Cab Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Woodson et al v. Pearl River County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
Lashunda Woodson, Melanie Curtis, Cynthia Wilson and others
Defendant:
Pearl River County, Mississippi, Forrest County, Mississippi, John Barton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bivens et al v. Roberts et al
as 2:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
Webster Bivens, Claretta Bivens, Catherine Bivens and others
Defendant:
Shirley Roberts, John McQuigg, Esq., Joseph Strength, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wilson v. Jones et al
as 2:2008cv00722
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Wilson, Cynthia Wilson, Cynthia Wilson and others
Defendant:
John Albert Jones, Julius Miller, Metry Cab Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
