Cases 41 - 50 of 157
Andrews v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv03491
Plaintiff:
Paula D. Andrews
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta v. Davis et al
as 2:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Acosta, III
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Director of TDCJ/STGMO, Responsible CRO (Classification Records Office) Official/s and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02782
Plaintiff:
Robert Gentry, Elizabeth Brady, Michelle Ayala and others
Defendant:
Does 1 - 50, Ethicon, Inc., Covidien, LP and others
Not Classified By Court:
Exponent Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CROOKS v. JONES et al.
as 3:2017cv00359
Plaintiff:
THERENCE W CROOKS
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, RICK SCOTT, J SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews, III v. Kirby Corporation
as 8:2017cv00435
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Andrews, III
Defendant:
Kirby Corporation and Kirby Offshore Marine Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ANDREW v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2017cv00206
Petitioner:
BILLY D ANDREW
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANDREW v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2017cv00112
Petitioner:
BILLY D ANDREW
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foster v. Coleman et al
as 2:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Charles E Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Tameka Coleman, Moses Jackson and Jefferey D Andrews, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. Cundiff et al
as 6:2016cv00472
Defendant:
Warden D. Andrews, Warden FNU Armstrong, Vicki Cundiff and others
Plaintiff:
Tucker Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALKASALA, INC. v. PATTEN
as 2:2016cv06206
Plaintiff:
ALKASALA, INC.
Defendant:
D. ANDREW PATTEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
