Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 193
In re: Isaac Castillo
as 15-14567
Petitioner: In re: ISAAC D. CASTILLO
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Castillo v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv22718
Plaintiff: Issac D. Castillo
Defendant: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections , Florida Attorney General and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Agard v. Castillo et al
as 3:2015cv00854
Plaintiff: Corey Agard
Defendant: Juan D Castillo, Marion Feather, Princess Haverly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Castillo v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05165
Plaintiff: Josefina D. Castillo
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown-Bey v. Castillo et al
as 4:2015cv00076
Plaintiff: Larry D Brown-Bey
Defendant: Juan D Castillo, Kate Adkins, Jeffrey Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Isaac Castillo
as 15-10673
Petitioner: In re: ISAAC D. CASTILLO
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Abdus-Shahid Ali v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 15-1287
Plaintiff - Appellant: Abdus-Shahid M.S. Ali
Defendant - Appellee: Charles E. Samuels, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Former Director, Bureau of Prisons, Juan D. Castillo, Warden, USMCFP and others
Del Muro G. v. Young et al
as 3:2014cv02963
Petitioner: Alberto Jose Del Muro G.
Respondent: David L. Young , Juan D. Castillo , Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Isaac Castillo
as 14-15172
Petitioner: In re: ISAAC D. CASTILLO
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nathaniel Green v. Juan Castillo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3377
Petitioner - Appellant: Nathaniel Green
Respondent - Appellee: Juan D. Castillo and United States Parole Commission

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?