Cases 41 - 48 of 48
MORALES et al v. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al
as 1:2011cv03452
Plaintiff:
JOELLE MORALES and DANIEL MORALES
Defendant:
TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and SDA MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morales-Corbala v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv00025
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, GEO Group, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Ramon Daniel Morales-Corbala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morales-Corbala v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00561
Petitioner:
Ramon Daniel Morales-Corbala
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daniel Camacho v. Bruno Stolc, et al
as 10-15024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL MORALES CAMACHO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUNO STOLC, Warden, Red Rock Correctional Center, in his individual and official capacity, GILBERT LAGUNAS, in his individual and official capacity and CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
US v. Fermin
as 09-1841
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
NICOLAS FERMIN, a/k/a Freddie Perez, a/k/a Antonio Roa, a/k/a Daniel Morales-Diaz, a/k/a Freddy Antonio Perez, a/k/a Benjamin Vargas-Adames
US v. Fermin
as 09-1842
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
NICOLAS FERMIN, a/k/a Freddie Perez, a/k/a Antonio Roa, a/k/a Daniel Morales-Diaz, a/k/a Freddy Antonio Perez, a/k/a Benjamin Vargas-Adames
David Masa Arauz et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Miranda Abrego, Fermin Miranda Alvarez, David Masa Arauz and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
JAIMES-v-CRYSTAL JANITORIAL SERVICE, INC., ET AL.
as 5:2008cv03922
Plaintiff:
CIRRILIO JAIMES
Defendant:
Crystal Janitorial Service Inc. and Daniel Morales
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
