Cases 41 - 50 of 169
Allen v. Mobley
as 1:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
David R. Allen, IV
Defendant:
Edward Reece Mobley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENKINS v. ALLEN et al
as 5:2018cv00233
Plaintiff:
WENDELL BRADFORD JENKINS
Defendant:
DAVID W. ALLEN, STEPHEN G. KLONEL, REBECCA NICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Allen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2018cv00215
Petitioner:
David Bryan Allen
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00004
Petitioner:
David Bryan Allen
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv02873
Petitioner:
David Bryan Allen
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wells v. Kessler Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv02709
Plaintiff:
Kerry S. Wells
Defendant:
Kessler Corporation, Charles C. McCloskey , Lincoln Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Ryder Systems, Inc. v. Charleston Aluminum Transportation, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00718
Plaintiff:
Ryder Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Charleston Aluminum Transportation, LLC and David E. Allen
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2702
Allen v. Davis
as 5:2017cv01041
Petitioner:
David Lee Allen
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Davis
as 2:2017cv00310
Petitioner:
David Lee Allen
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2017cv01788
Petitioner:
David Bryan Allen
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
