Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Kates et al v. Blake
as 5:2009cv05100
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jean Kates and Donald Andrew Kates
Defendant:
Dwight Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Andrews v. Mitchell
as 6:2009cv00587
Petitioner:
Donald Andrews
Respondent:
Mary Mitchell
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ANDREWS v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90211
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANDREWS
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Allen v. Henderson
as 3:2008cv00034
Petitioner:
Donald Andrew Allen
Respondent:
Tony Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Henderson
as 5:2008cv00079
Petitioner:
Donald Andrew Allen
Respondent:
Tony Henderson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vandeaver v. Combined Transport Inc et al
as 5:2007cv00170
Plaintiff:
Tommy Vandeaver
Defendant:
Combined Transport Inc and Donald Andrew Carre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
DICKINSON et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2007cv66198
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. DICKINSON, DORTHA DISMUKE, JR., EVA DISMUKE and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GRAY et al v. PATAPSCO & BACK RIVER RAIL ROAD CO.
as 2:2007cv62764
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANDREW GRAY, DONALD ANDREW GRAY and DAVID E ESTEPPE
Defendant:
PATAPSCO & BACK RIVER RAIL ROAD CO. and PATAPSCO & BACK RIVER RAIL ROAD CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Parker et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2004cv04476
Plaintiff:
Alex B. Parker, Christopher Adeniyi, Olubunmi Olayemi Ajayi and others
Defendant:
City of New York and The New York City Department of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
