Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Carollo v. Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11140
Plaintiff:
Tonya Freeman, Christopher Grogan, Geeroso Giammarino and others
Defendant:
Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Hart et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12353
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hoffman, Eslyn Jeffrey, Frederick Jimenez and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
KING v. BURR et al
as 2:2018cv03751
Defendant:
JUDGE CHARLES B. BURR, II, RIVERWATCH CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION and JUDGE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER
Plaintiff:
DANIEL KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardee et al v. Carteret County et al
as 7:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Hardee and Carol M. Hardee
Defendant:
Carteret County , Asa B. Buck , Daniel King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hardee et al v. Carteret County et al
as 5:2018ct03006
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Hardee and Carol M. Hardee
Defendant:
Carteret County , Asa B. Buck , Daniel King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hogan v. Buck et al
as 4:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Hogan
Defendant:
Asa B Buck, III, Daniel King, Carteret County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel King v. Charles Burr, II, et al
as 17-3045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL KING
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE CHARLES B. BURR, II, Individually and RIVERWATCH CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION
KING v. BURR et al
as 2:2017cv02315
Plaintiff:
DANIEL KING
Defendant:
CHARLES B. BURR, II and RIVER WATCH CONDOMINIUM OWNER'S ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Progress Construction Co., Inc. v. King et al
as 3:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
Progress Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel King and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
U.S. Fire Insurance Company v. Harvest Investors Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01901
Plaintiff:
U.S. Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Harvest Investors, Inc, Jung Kuk Kim, Katarina Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
