Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Henry et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-01037
Plaintiff: Kathleen Henry and Daniel Henry
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Dillman et al v. County of Alameda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00325
Plaintiff: Daniel Henry Dillman , Gina Dillman , Tianna Dillman and others
Defendant: County of Alameda, Terrance H. Montigue and Michael D. Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Daniel Padron
as 11-50545
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL HENRY PADRON, AKA Danny Boy, AKA Sneaks, AKA Sneaky
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11405
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lauer et al v. Henry Cap Construction Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00171
Plaintiff: Michael Lauer , William Nix , David Tharp and others
Defendant: Henry Cap Construction Inc and Daniel Henry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C et al
as 3:2010cv00582
Plaintiff: E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C, Unknown Heirs of Daniel Henry Loe, Unknown Heirs of Mattie Loe Lann and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Daniel Henry Padron
as 5:2010mj00025
Defendant: Daniel Henry Padron (7)
Plaintiff: USA
USA v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2010mj00025
Defendant: Jose Arredondo (9), Robert Zavala Carrillo (2), Ignacio Chavez (5) and others
Plaintiff: USA
Richard Fine v. Sheriff of Los Angeles County, et al
as 09-56073
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD I. FINE
Respondent - Appellee: SHERIFF OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, JUDGE DAVID P. YAFEE, Hon. David P. Yaffe and SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Amicus Curiae - Pending: DANIEL HENRY GOTTLIEB
Schoenfeld #227495 v. Palmer
as 1:2007cv01042
Petitioner: Daniel Henry Schoenfeld #227495
Respondent: Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?