Cases 41 - 50 of 87
HUTCHINS v. SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK et al
as 1:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK, ADAM & EVE HAIRCARE, COMMUNITY CRISIS COUNSELING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geico Indemnity Company v. Cordova et al
as 4:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Geico Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Sean Michael Cordova , Mary Dysart and Brandon Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Patricia Dysart, et al
as 15-8020
Respondent:
Patricia Dysart, Kay Lorraine Johnston, Concetta Bonfiglio and others
Petitioner:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, formerly known as Luzenac America, Inc.
Nell Dysart v. Trustmark National Bank
as 15-14690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NELL C. DYSART
Defendant - Appellee:
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, a corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dysart et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv01221
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia J. Dysart , Kay Lorraine Johnston , Concetta Bonfiglio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barbara Lumpkins v. United States Government, et al
as 15-5093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Barbara B. Lumpkins
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Government, Jay C. Zainey, personally, Susan E. Morgan, personally and others
Rankins v. Dysart
as 5:2015ct03017
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Christian Dysart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
