Cases 41 - 49 of 49
TERRY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65012
Plaintiff:
HERBERT HOOVER TERRY and LONA E. TERRY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Smoak, et al v. Eric Hall, et al
as 09-5129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES W. SMOAK, PAMELA Z. SMOAK and BRANDON HAYDEN
Defendant:
ERIC HALL, MEAD MCWHORTER, BRUCE LAMB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BUSH
James Smoak, et al v. Eric Hall, et al
as 08-5941
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES W. SMOAK, PAMELA Z. SMOAK and BRANDON HAYDEN
Defendant:
ERIC HALL, MEAD MCWHORTER, BRUCE LAMB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BUSH
Mitchell v. Alexander et al
as 2:2008cv02496
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell
Defendant:
Alexander, Shelby County Division of Corrections, John Campbell and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Terry v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
Brian E Terry
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration and Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Robert E. Terry v. E.D. Bullard Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-60726
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Terry
Defendant:
E.D. Bullard Co
James Smoak, et al v. Eric Hall, et al
as 08-5442
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES W. SMOAK, PAMELA Z. SMOAK and BRANDON HAYDEN
Defendant:
ERIC HALL, MEAD MCWHORTER, BRUCE LAMB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BUSH
TERRY v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60726
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. TERRY, ROBERT E. TERRY, ROBERT E. TERRY and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Williams v. Terry et al
as 5:2007cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kim Landry Williams
Defendant:
William E Terry, Rick Toney, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
