Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Dickey v. Kennedy
as 10-2144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD KENNEDY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Kennedy v. Edward Reilly, Jr.
as 10-6390
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY, #35377-098
Respondent - Appellee:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., Chairman, United States Parole Commission, CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, Commissioner, United States Parole Commission, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, Commissioner, United States Parole Commission and others
Michael Kennedy v. Eastern Shore Psychological
as 10-1282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
EASTERN SHORE PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, KATHRYN SEIFERT, KAREN E. RAY and others
Kennedy v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2009cv05175
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Kennedy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Michael Kennedy v. Michael Allera
as 09-7556
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. ALLERA and KATHY SEIFERT, Dr.
Ada Ron-Messer v. National Democrat Party, et al
as 09-5296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ada L. Ron-Messer
Defendant - Appellee:
National Democrat Party, William J. Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Michael Kennedy v. US
as 09-7306
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kennedy v. Reilly et al
as 1:2009cv01802
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Kennedy
Respondent:
Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell, Patricia K. Cushwa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Kennedy v. Eastern Shore Psychological Se
as 09-1746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
EASTERN SHORE PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, KATHRYN SEIFERT, KAREN E. RAY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
