Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Edward Ray, Jr. v. A. Leal, et al
as 16-16482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
A. LEAL, Serial #8587P /Ind. and Off. cap, FRANCIS, #8365P and M. ZIEBRATH, #8281P
Ray v. Wentworth et al
as 2:2016cv02591
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Jennifer Wentworth, David Strong and Beverly Triplett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Jefferson et al
as 4:2016cv02652
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Jamilah A. Jefferson, Otis McGee, Jr. and City of Oakland, CA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Beard
as 3:2015cv05327
Petitioner:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Respondent:
Jeffrey Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Thomas Owens, et al
as 15-2652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS OWENS, Detective, Johnstown Police Department, Individually and in his Official Capacity, BETH MCCONNELL, Caseworker, Childern and Youth Services, Individually and in her official Capacity, TINA HIPPLER, Caseworker for Childern and Youth Services, in her individual and official capacity and others
RAY v. OWENS et al
as 3:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS OWENS, BETH MCCONNELL, TINA HIPPLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Maceri
as 2:2015cv00252
Defendant:
Carlo Maceri
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edward Ray, Jr. v. John Deffenbaugh, et al
as 14-17026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DEFFENBAUGH, M.D., D.D.S., F. ZHANG, M.D., D.D.S., G. CHEUNG, M.D., D.D.S. and others
Ray v. Maceri
as 2:2014cv01886
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Carlo Maceri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edward Ray, Jr. v. CPS, et al
as 14-16222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and NATHAN HOBBS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
