Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv09317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02588
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Southern Concrete Products, Inc. v. The Euclid Chemical Company et al
as 3:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
Southern Concrete Products, Inc.
Defendant:
The Euclid Chemical Company and Giant Cement Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Euclid Chemical Company v. Ware et al
as 1:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Euclid Chemical Company
Defendant:
Robert Ware and RKC Increte Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Hardaway Concrete Company Inc v. Euclid Chemical Company, The
as 3:2010cv01568
Plaintiff:
Hardaway Concrete Company Inc
Defendant:
Euclid Chemical Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe County Water Authority v. The Euclid Chemical Company et al
as 6:2009cv06111
Plaintiff:
Monroe County Water Authority and Monroe County Water Authority
Defendant:
The Euclid Chemical Company, The Euclid Chemical Company and Tamms Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EUCLID CHEMICAL V VECTOR CORROSION
as 08-1170
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee:
David Whitmore
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant:
The Euclid Chemical Company
Defendant-Appellee:
Vector Corrosion Technologies, Inc.
Polymer Solvents, LLC v. Reichhold, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00483
Plaintiff:
Polymer Solvents, LLC, Polymer Solvents, LLC and Polymer Solvents, LLC
Defendant:
Reichhold, Inc., RPM Wood Finishes Group, Inc., The Euclid Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Euclid Chemical Company v. Strickland
as 1:2003cv00650
Plaintiff:
Euclid Chemical Company
Defendant:
Bruce R. Strickland
Not Classified By Court:
Esq. Robert J. Fogarty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
